It's hard to imagine even the staunchest communist true believer in 1923 imagining the staggering success they would have with their infiltration and planned demolition of White Western Civilization. If anything, the totality of their victory has left their spiritual descendents full of dangerous arrogance. The enemy no longer disguises their intentions and open hatred of Whites is now common, even in what passes for the mainstream "left."
The end result is a piece of jewish garbage spewing hatred against Whites. This is the face of the enemy, the nation-wreckers that have unleashed the plagues of illegal immigration, negro crime, feminism, the sodomite agenda, worthless currency, zionist-fueled foreign war, cultural sickness and all the rest. This is what they really think about White people, when the polite lies are discarded as no longer necessary. When the mask slips off.
As we now move into the official Political Aftermath period of the Boston bombing — the period that will determine the long-term legislative fallout of the atrocity — the dynamics of privilege will undoubtedly influence the nation’s collective reaction to the attacks. That’s because privilege tends to determine: 1) which groups are — and are not — collectively denigrated or targeted for the unlawful actions of individuals; and 2) how big and politically game-changing the overall reaction ends up being.
I was more concerned about the continuing erosion of rights and the disturbing tendency to turn these events into political footballs then the "dynamics of privilege," but I guess it's because I'm one of the "cattle." In this jew's hate-filled mind it's right and proper that there be knee-jerk laws. Just make sure those laws are as anti-White as possible, that's all he asks.
However, white male privilege means white men are not collectively denigrated/targeted for those shootings — even though most come at the hands of white dudes.
"Dudes?" Really? Man, communism is so radical, I love your happenin' slang, hep cat. 23 Skidoo.
In reality "White dudes" are actually not responsible for most mass shootings. This is a lie that survives only because no one seriously examines it, just like old, completely discredited lies like "It's poverty, not race!" and "Intelligence testing is culturally biased!"
Likewise, in the context of terrorist attacks, such privilege means white non-Islamic terrorists are typically portrayed not as representative of whole groups or ideologies, but as “lone wolf” threats to be dealt with as isolated law enforcement matters.
Yeah, that happens. Remember when we went to war with Islam after 9-11? When we invaded Saudi Arabia, the homeland of the hijackers? When our president declared Islam as "a hate-filled death cult that must be destroyed?" When it was declared that no muslim could come within ten miles of "ground zero," let alone try to build a giant mosque near it or something crazy like that.
Wait, I don't remember those things. Maybe because none of them happened. Instead the actions of terrorists are blamed on Youtube videos. Since the September 11 attacks there has been a 74 percent increase in American mosques.
I actually care about facts and the truth, instead of pushing a marxist "narrative" like this piece of kosher dog shit.
“White privilege is knowing that if this bomber turns out to be white, the United States government will not bomb whatever corn field or mountain town or stale suburb from which said bomber came, just to ensure that others like him or her don’t get any ideas."
Here the author quotes Tim Wise, another "Chosen" person who just happens to be virulently anti-White. The jew fantasizes about bombing rural Whites. Or, if that's too messy, maybe a campaign of starvation and disease might work.
This is the insane, unreasoning, implacable hate we're up against.
That means regardless of your particular party affiliation, if you care about everything from stopping war to reducing the defense budget to protecting civil liberties to passing immigration reform, you should hope the bomber was a white domestic terrorist. Why? Because only in that case will privilege work to prevent the Boston attack from potentially undermining progress on those other issues.
Let's translate: "If you care about everything from more zionist war, to making our own country weak, to special rights and protected groups, to promoting a mudslide of meskins over an open border, you should pray to your father the devil that it's a White man. Why? Because I have a virulent hatred for normal White America, for the Republic, for the Constitution, for Christ and the church, for gun ownership, for a healthy middle class, and for anything other than my tribe ruling over a ruined nation of brown slaves."
The mask slipped.
Put another way, white privilege will work to not only insulate whites from collective blame, but also to insulate the political debate from any fallout from the attack.
Whites are never collectively blamed for anything in the U.S.S.A., because of our privilege. Except slavery. And Jim Crowe. And the indian wars. And opposing "civil rights." And causing low negro test scores. And a few thousand other things. But not terrorism, no sir.
In other, unrelated news, homeland security is practicing with targets of White civilians, including women and children and Christians are considered to be terrorists in Amerika. Just keep lying, jew. Your audience of brain-dead liberal lambs to the slaughter probably even believe it.
Everyone is equal, but some of us are more equal. The negro and may-hee-can are more equal than Whites. The sodomite is even more equal. At the top of the stack is the light of the world, the kosher criminal. The amount of hatred our enemies have for us is absolutely staggering, when the first thought they have is "how can we use a bombing to bash Whitey" and then fantasize about carpet-bombing Iowa farms. We are opposed by pure evil. We are the good guys, we are the ones with truth and decency on our side and we're going to win.