The Profit Motive

Is there a solution for the urban rot in my globalist kosher bodega? Of course, I'm very optimistic about the completely insane "infrastructure bill" somehow achieving some minor positives at the cost of stuffing our national dead body politic into the oven, but perhaps there's a better plan than scorched earth fiscal psychosis. I know, there probably isn't, but we must be open-minded when it comes to addressing the rapid collapse of Weimar America while ignoring the racial component at all cost. So far my best ideas include throwing a giant net over Chiraq or maybe holding the negro in place with giant magnets. I'll freely concede that these suggestions might be somewhat impractical, but they're still better than the staggering idiocy offered by the dyke tar alien from hell. 

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot is expected to announce an effort to sue local gangs as a way to curb rampant gun violence, according to a local affiliate report. 

We're going to stop the drilling with nuisance lawsuits. A jewish problem needs a jewish solution, I guess. The local tribal war bands, which apparently operate with impunity right out in the open, now might be "served" by shlomo after Barkevious gets zapped while sitting in a car.

The Democratic mayor is expected to announce a plan that would allow city attorneys to take legal action against gang affiliated offenders, FOX 32 Chicago reported.

On tonight's episode of Judge Jew-dy the city of Chiraq is asking for a few large from hittahs after 100 humanoids were smoked over the weekend. I'd be absolutely shocked if this somehow fails.

"As a city we are using every tool to push back against the gangs that are leaving a trail of blood, death and misery in their wake," Lightfoot said, according to the report.

Every possible tool, except actually arresting the simian criminals. We're going to trust kosher ambulance chasers to succeed where "community policing on steroids" and "social workers" failed miserably. 

If successful in their legal efforts, the city could thwart gangs’ activities by seizing property, such as weapons, money and vehicles.

We bee comin foe yo azz-salt way-pawns, chedda an whips.

"What we are proposing is a tool in civil courts that gives us the opportunity to go after those gangs that are wreaking havoc," Lightfoot reportedly said, "and in particular, take away the profit motive from them by seizing assets that they have been able to purchase because of their violent activity in our neighborhoods."

We're going to reclaim the vacant lots you purchased with fiat currency earned by walking up to other nightmare animals in alleys and blasting.

The Chicago Police Department has been outspoken about its struggle combating gun violence, especially at the hands of violent gangs, in recent months. 

The long war against inanimate objects and intentionally misleading abstractions continues.

Speaking to reporters during a crime press conference on Monday, Counterterrorism Chief Ernest Cato said the department's would be "laser-focused" on gangs and narcotics in the city. 

My patience is wearing thin.

So far this year, CPD has made 1,931 total arrests, and has recovered total narcotics having an estimated street value of $328 million.

"Heckuva job, Brownie" seems woefully inadequate.  

Sixty people were shot in Chicago from 6 p.m. Friday through Sunday, including 11 children, according to police. One of the kids, 12, did not survive. And eight children were shot over the extended Labor Day weekend, including a 4-year-old boy who died days after he was struck by a bullet intended for someone else, police said. 

This happened because we weren't sending in the lawyers.

Last week, Police Superintendent David O. Brown begged the city’s criminals to stay away from children.

Pleeze stawp blassin dem fuggin keeds, nikkas.

"That’s on you," he added. 

Yeah. No kidding.

Full Story.

I'm here to serve papers to you gentlemen.


  1. Wonder if our highly esteemed afghan interpreters will be present when the papers are served.

    1. You might even find one that actually worked as an interpreter, if you're lucky.

    2. >Tribal Warfare

      One of the tags on this posts is 'Tribal Warfare' -- here's a link to a video of Ilhan Omar saying 'This is not going to be the country of white people' (whom she first labels 'xenophobes' for wanting to keep people like her out, i.e. people who go on to rhetorically inveigh against white people and white America):

      Watch it, then ask yourself if the influx of even more people who hate you and want to dispossess you and your descendants, or who will vote for people like that in the future, is really something you want to joke about.

      Throughout human history, for a tribe/people to survive it has been imperative to not only conquer and hold territory, but to defend that territory and exclude other tribes and peoples -- as anyone can see, nothing has changed -- it is naive and suicidal to believe it has.

    3. Wars don't have to be fought with guns in the modern era. Law and media will do the same job, with much less damage to assets.

    4. >Wars don't have to be fought with guns in the modern era.

      LOL, yeah OK -- ask the Palestinians how that strategy is working out -- how many UN resolutions have there been condemning Israel? -- for its settlement activity etc etc.

      Or ask the Rhodesians and South Africans how much their laws mattered as Blacks killed and plundered their property, only to be pardoned later in the name of 'truth and reconciliation'.

      I'm sure they'll soon stop tearing down the statues and removing the portraits of dead white guys *any day now*, realizing it was all a big mistake.

      'Absolute power corrupts absolutely' -- perhaps you've heard the expression.

      Like I said: 'naive and suicidal' -- or maybe 'muh Constitution' -- people like you don't seem to comprehend that the system is too far gone -- there is no salvaging it; there is no changing its course -- once politicians and the media no longer show any kind of *self-restraint* in their rhetoric and actions, it's already too late -- because they've reached the point where they don't respect the *spirit* of the law, so not respecting the *letter* of the law is next.

      Go review Grutter v Bollinger, the SCOTUS decision that justified discrimination based *solely on race* in university admissions by saying the state has a 'compelling interest' in achieving 'diversity', and then ask yourself: what else will they justify in the same way?

      And BTW, Chauvin et al just pled not guilty in the federal civil rights case over George Floyd -- I guess sentencing him to 40+ years wasn't enough.

  2. This comment has been removed by the author.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Shocking Discovery

Supremacy Division

Your Vote Matters